Research Gap-to-Paper Workflow Kit
Move from a literature landscape to a defensible, author-led paper plan.

No production checkout or download is active
This page presents the prepared product and planned price. Jivaro will activate purchase only after sandbox, webhook, D1, R2, recovery, refund, and production smoke tests pass.
What this product does
A structured workflow for mapping a field, verifying a candidate gap, testing feasibility, framing a contribution, and building an author-led paper plan.
Move from a literature landscape to a defensible, author-led paper plan.
What is in the package
- Offline HTML workflow builder
- Gap and evidence templates
- Paper planning guides
- Three worked examples
- Author responsibility and verification checklists
Key capabilities
- Landscape and claim mapping
- Gap classification
- Feasibility checks
- Contribution framing
- Paper and journal-fit planning
How it works
The core workflow is model-agnostic and includes optional profiles for major instruction-following language models. The offline builder does not contact a model, server, analytics service, or external API.
- Model-agnostic
- ChatGPT
- Claude
- Gemini
- Other instruction-following LLM
Use terms
Single-user or single-business commercial-use license. Completed outputs may be used commercially. The builder, templates, source files, and packaged product may not be redistributed, resold, sublicensed, or published.
30 days of product-function support and 12 months of compatible product updates are planned.
Prepared, not yet for sale
The complete versioned package exists in Jivaro’s private product inventory. PayPal checkout, private delivery, recovery, refund handling, and customer support routes are installed but production checkout remains inactive. No payment is accepted from this page.
Frequently asked questions
No. The kit supports legitimate research planning, source verification, and author-led drafting; it is not designed for academic cheating.
Yes. Use Source-Only mode, or choose Research or Hybrid mode when additional evidence gathering is appropriate.
It helps compare a paper plan with stated journal scope and requirements, but the author must verify current journal policies.
